Page 10 - Seniorstoday November 2023 Issue
P. 10

Essay





























         Have Marwaris


         lost their Midas touch?                                                                             Forbes India






         My friends, the reports of the demise of the Marwari Midas touch are greatly
         exaggerated, writes Harsh Goenka

         A Gujarati industrialist recently remarked,        same period. While these figures show the
         ‘You Marwaris have lost the Midas touch!’          community remaining as relevant as one
         Current public perception certainly seems          of the top wealth creators, it was equally
         to corroborate his observation. But have           obvious they no longer occupied centre
         they really lost the Midas touch? My               stage.
         first point of search was data on the Top           The community’s historically pre-
         50 business houses in the country. In              Independence dominance continued
         1964 there were 13 top Marwari families            after 1947, with many Marwari business
         comprising 26% of the highest echelon              houses ruling the roost with the likes of the
         of business houses. In 1990, the figure            Tatas. Entrepreneurial, as well as astute
         increased to 14 families comprising 28%. In        negotiators, their keen understanding
         2000, this remained static.                        of costs and sense of financial risk
          Comparing the number of Marwaris in               management set the stage for their rise in
         2013 that made it to the Forbes list of top        industry as well as in the financial services
         IOO Indian billionaires with those in 2022         sector in the post-Independence era.
         showed that while there were 29 Marwaris            This dominance continued till
         in 2013, in 2022, the number had gone              liberalisation. Unfortunately, this time
         down to 26, but the number of Marwaris             around, Marwaris were not in a position to
         in the first 10 had risen from 2 to 4 in the       take advantage of the opportunities. With


    10
   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15